This story on the BBC caused me to do a double take when I first saw it:
Quizzed on Iran in the Commons, Mr Blair said the world’s security lay in spreading “freedom and democracy”.
But Mr Howard later said he was talking “gibberish” given that Iran’s president had been “democratically elected”.
The West fears Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons after it broke seals on a research facility.
“To go on and on about democracy, has he forgotten that the president of Iran, the cause of all this trouble, was actually democratically elected?,” Mr Howard told BBC Two’s Daily Politics. (emphasis added)
What planet is the Tory party’s former leader on?
In Iran, the Supreme Leader’s authority overrides all other authorities. It is the same country that has a Guardian Council to vet candidates, whether for presidential or parliamentary elections, which barred 2,530 out of 8,157 candidates in recent parliamentary elections. In the Presidential elections, 1000 candidates entered, but only 8 were allowed to run. The Guardian Council can veto laws that are un Islamic and anti Constitutional. It is appointed by the Supreme Leader (6 members) and the head of the judiciary (6 members). The head of the judiciary is also appointed by the Supreme Leader. And Howard thinks this makes Ahmadinejad a democratically elected leader?!